Good Monday AM!
Can't stop to chat, must fly off to work soon, so check out Gorilla Guides and read on.
If the Iraqi People Get Revenue Sharing, They Lose Their Oil to Exxon - "Buried deep in the legislation and intentionally obscured is a near-guarantee of success for the Bush Administration’s true objective of the war-capturing Iraq’s oil-and George Bush will not casually forego that."
You have a battery charger of some sort, right? For a digital camera, or video camera? Most of us do. Yeah, well THAT is what landed this Brit in Guantanamo for 5 years.
Google swaps current New Orleans satellite imagery with pre-Katrina imagery. Google asked by Congress to tell them by April 6th "if Google was contacted by the city, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the U.S. Geological Survey or any other government entity about changing the imagery."
The prove how safe Baghdad is, McCain Strolls Through Baghdad Market, Accompanied By 100 Soldiers, 3 Blackhawks, 2 Apache Gunships. Yep, that's what I said.
Seen on the back of a neighbor's car: We're creating more terrorists than we can kill them.
If the Iraqi People Get Revenue Sharing, They Lose Their Oil to Exxon - "Buried deep in the legislation and intentionally obscured is a near-guarantee of success for the Bush Administration’s true objective of the war-capturing Iraq’s oil-and George Bush will not casually forego that."
You have a battery charger of some sort, right? For a digital camera, or video camera? Most of us do. Yeah, well THAT is what landed this Brit in Guantanamo for 5 years.
Google swaps current New Orleans satellite imagery with pre-Katrina imagery. Google asked by Congress to tell them by April 6th "if Google was contacted by the city, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the U.S. Geological Survey or any other government entity about changing the imagery."
The prove how safe Baghdad is, McCain Strolls Through Baghdad Market, Accompanied By 100 Soldiers, 3 Blackhawks, 2 Apache Gunships. Yep, that's what I said.
Seen on the back of a neighbor's car: We're creating more terrorists than we can kill them.
by MG at 7:22 AM
3 Comments:
I wasn't aware about the oil stipulation but with this mess in office, it makes sense.
Doesn't all Iraqi's have 100 U.S soldiers, helicopters and gunships following them around on their shopping ventures through the "safe streets" of Baghdad?
www.lydiacornell.com
Wasn't the name of this invasion "Operation Iraqi Liberation" - oh, wait...
Yes, can anyone having any common sense at this point still harbor any doubts as to the real reason the U.S. is in Iraq? It's the world's second-largest oil producer, sitting on a lake of oil. Come on now. It was obvious from day one. Remember Bush's speech on the eve of launching this war of aggression? In it he twice urged the Iraqi people to not do anything to harm the oil fields and infrastructure. The first engagement was a Navy S.E.A.L. unit seizing an Iraqi oil rig in the Gulf. Early and critically important objectives in the ground fighting were seizing the Iraqi oil fields. The Iraq war is one part of a larger plan to secure as much control as possible over as much of the world's remaining oil and natural gas reserves as possible. Ever wonder why the vast majority of the documents from Cheney's "Energy Task Force" meetings from 2001 are still classified? Everywhere that the Cheney regime tries to connect to the so-called "war on terror" involves oil and/or natural gas exploration, extraction or transport to market. From Iraq which the regime claims is the "central front" in the "war on terror", whose relation to oil is self-explanatory, to Afghanistan, sitting on real estate that is
crucially important real estate as it is wedged in between Turkmenistan and Pakistan.
If someone looks up the T.A.P.(-I.) or Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (-India) gas and oil pipelines project they will find that the Taliban government of Afghanistan was the only country's government along the proposed pipeline trace that was demanding terms that the U.S. wouldn't agree to, namely that the U.S. invest significantly in rebuilding Afghanistan's badly-damaged infrastructure and that some of the gas from the pipeline be allowed to be diverted to local use. The P.N.A.C. Cheney regime had no interest in helping rebuild Afghanistan's infrastructure at that time and wanted the pipeline to be for export use only. So negotiations broke down in the high summer of 2001, with a last chance meeting between the U.S. and the Taliban taking place in early August. The Cheney regime had already been planning for an invasion of Afghanistan before the winter snows since July in case the Taliban remained unyielding. With no chance remaining of settling the matter with negotiations, and anxious anyway to begin the war for resource dominance, they just needed "a new Pearl Harbor" to scare the hell out of America and make them more than willing to "go git them turrrsts".
Then look at the Philippines, where the U.S. is supposedly battling the "Abu Sayyaf" fighters on Jolo and Basilan, oil-rich islands in the Sulu Sea.
Then consider the U.S. military aid to Georgia (the nation) including sending 200 Green Berets there to help train the Georgian Army in protecting the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan gas pipeline from Chechen terrorists. Since 9/11 the U.S. has also gotten pretty close with Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, even forming the joint Azeri-Kazakh naval force called the Caspian Guard, to protect the offshore oil rigs in the Caspian.
Even in Somalia, where the U.S.-friendly Ethiopian Army was goaded into invading with considerable advice and targeting assistance, and even a small amount of air support from the U.S. military, based in Djibouti and Kenya. U.S. Marines and C.I.A. personnel also were present in southern Somalia across the border from Kenya. Somalia is sitting on an undetermined (but sizeable) amount of untapped oil, waiting only on a stable government in Mogadishu that has control of the hinterlands. Somalia also is in a very important geographical location, being next to the southern entrance to the Red Sea.
Everywhere in the "war on terror" there's oil and/or natural gas. The "war" is nothing but a thinly-disguised effort to secure American dominance over the world's remaining oil/gas reserves. But don't just take my word for it, do some research on it; you'll be surprised and disgusted by what you find.
On a related note, I happened to be flipping around on the t.v. tonight and saw something on C-Span 2 that was alarming to say the least. There was a dialogue between John MacLaughlin (sp.?), former acting C.I.A. director and currently with the Brookings Institution, an editor from the New York Times, one from the Washington Post, and a couple other people. They seemed to be trying to decide whether or not the New York Times should or should not have reported on things that (they claim) "possibly threatened national security". MacLaughlin kept returning to 9/11 and said at least four separate times that he feels sure the "terrorists" are going to hit us again soon. It just seemed like he was trying to prepare people for another Cheney administration false flag "terrorist" attack; maybe he is just a person that tends to repeat himself a lot but he seemed to be purposefully trying to hammer the idea home that sometime soon the "terrorists" will attack again somewhere in America. It might be nothing but it is something to keep an eye on. If something DID happen my bet would be on a suitcase nuke probably in a city in a Blue state. I'm hoping MacLaughlin was just fearmongering to try to continue "justifying" the jackbooted police state measures the Cheney administration is infatuated with and not prepping editors for another false flag operation, and this could very well be the case. All I was saying is that knowing what I know it sounded creepy, but I am hoping it is nothing.
Post a Comment
<< Home