THE Blog to Read
I think from now on, I will begin posts with a link to Gorilla's Guides. I think it's one of the most powerful blogs out there. Please spend some time there and then feel free to come and tell me why we should be there. I KNOW there's a few of you still thinkin' it's a good idea...
by MG at 5:59 PM
7 Comments:
But, doesn't this prove that we should be there to help these people?
First, Kirk, since when did killing, imprisoning, raping, and destroying qualify as helping?
Hello Moxie, I appreciate your work, your blog, and miss you when you're MIA. Have been hospitalized a little lately (In the VA system, much better than the Army system), and am slow in writing when this happens.
Will try to comment more.
Friends, Longshiren.
First time I have seen this site. Thanks for showing it.
www.lydiacornell.com
Leung: Ask a Democratic. They are the Osama Hussein apologists. You're asking the wrong person since I am 110% Republican.
Kirk:
"Osama Hussein apologists"...
Where do I begin? First of all, Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein are two different people. Two VERY different people; Osama is an Islamic fundamentalist of the Wahabbi persuasion. Of course I don't expect you to understand what that means so I will try to put it in simpler terms for you. He is to Islam what Pat Robertson is to Christianity. Saddam Hussein on the other hand was a secular dictator of the Ba'ath (Arab "socialist") Party. Saddam did NOT want Iraq being flooded with religious nutcases as they could potentially undermine his secular government by advocating a theocratic based alternative. For his part, Osama called Saddam an infidel, the supreme insult coming from an Islamic fundamentalist. So it's pretty easy to see, Saddam and Osama were not working together and had much more in the way of differences than similarities. Now I realize this is hard to wrap your mind/brain stem/cluster of nerve endings around Kirk, and I know it is not what you want to hear that they are not part of some monolithic "Islamo-fascist" movement, that just because they both happen to be Islamic does NOT by any means that they are "in it together". I also know that this is going to have little or no effect on you since you seem very willing to believe only what you want to believe. Anyone at this point who considers themselves "110% Republican" is basically unteachable, but hey, you can't blame me for trying.
So no, Saddam wasn't in bed with Osama, and Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. But guess who did? YOUR OWN FUCKING GOVERNMENT YOU STUPID ASSHOLE!!!!! WAKE THE HELL UP!!!!!
http://www.wtc7.net/
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/
http://www.911blimp.net/vid_Naudet.shtml
http://www.911blimp.net/cached/HuntTheBoeing!.htm
http://cryptogon.com/docs/Introducing%20the%20amazing%20Penta-Lawn%202000!%20(9-11).htm
http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/physics/
http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm
http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/wtc_buildings_collapse_steven_jones.htm
http://forum.afghansite.com/index.php?showtopic=9349
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/121104easilywithstood.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2001/12/19/usat-escape.htm
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/ignoring_9-11.html
http://kurtnimmo.blogspot.com/2005/08/apartment-of-nine-eleven-hero-william_28.html
http://www.wnbc.com/news/1315651/detail.html
http://research.amnh.org/users/tyson/essays/TheHorrorTheHorror.html
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Banaciski_Richard.txt
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Fitzpatrick_Tom.txt
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/more-proof-911-inside-job-witnesses-to.html
http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/veliz-bombs.htm
Entitlement: Yes, I know all about your kind's "multiple personality" theory. You are basically excusing Saddam bin Laden's atrocities under the guise of mental illness. Sorry moonbeam, but evil is not a mental illness – it's just evil. Also, I clicked and clicked, but none of your hyperlinks work. Learn to use the internets before spewing forth your inane theories.
Hey Kirk:
First of all you moron, THEY AREN'T CLICKABLE. Anyone with any sense knows if you see an address and it isn't the "clickable link" variety that the address is put there so you can take your paw and use the mouse to highlight the link, hit copy, then go to the address bar on your browser and hit paste. Just like magic it appears in your address bar and all you need to do then is to hit the enter key and you are instantaneously taken to the site. I realize this involves a few steps so it might confuse you somewhat but it is unintentional; practice it some and I'm sure in hardly any time at all you will master the excruciatingly simple process of cut-and-pasting links into your address bar. (I thought everyone knew how to do this; if you don't have a mouse on your computer I don't know what to tell you; otherwise it is a pretty simple process indeed).
Secondly, it isn't a "multiple personality" theory, it is having more than a handful of brain cells and being able to realize that just because someone is of the same religion as someone else means nothing as far as collusion; otherwise one could claim the Irish Republican Army is in cahoots with Poland since both are Catholic etc. I never said evil is a mental illness; conservatism apparantly is however. Combine conservatism with the sheer stupidity, myopia and intellectual incuriosity you faithfully exhibit and you have a recipe for disaster like no other. I explained in terms simple enough for even a mouth-breathing Bushite like yourself to be able to grasp if you are willing to pull your head out of Bush's ass long enough to read it. I realize using common sense and analyzing a matter goes against the grain of the "all them ragheads are in it together" redneck mantra, but believe me, matters of life and death deserve more than a brainless acceptance of the "word" of proven liars especially when anyone with more than an elementary school education should be able to see that the Cheney regime oversimplifies things and paints whole creeds of people with the same broad brush as it serves their interests much better than encouraging people to actually READ and look into the details of things. That's the last thing they want you to do Kirk and I'm sure they're so proud of people like you who swallow their childish, dumbed-down, jingoistic rhetoric hook, line and sinker. It's precisely what they want. By the way, even your beloved Bush admitted that there is no link between Saddam and 9/11. So what does that tell you? Is it those "evul libruls" who made him say that? Or is it because he realizes that the facts don't bear out a connection between the two and to continue to claim one diminishes his already-abysmal credibility? Think about it.
Thirdly, if you want to talk about "inane theories", how about the laughable fairy tale of the "nineteen hijackers with boxcutters" who somehow were able to defy physics to make 3 buildings "collapse" at freefall rate (a feat impossible in the real world without explosives, which is why the 9/11 whitewash commission and the N.I.S.T. report won't touch the issue of how they "collapsed" at freefall rate with a 10-ft. pole); "hijackers" who were somehow able to make the world's most high-tech Air Force of no more use on that morning than a couple guys with slingshots, though it took place over the part of the country that is thickest with Air Force bases and there were even F-15s in the air off Long Island but "didn't get there in time" while others were sent out over the Atlantic for reasons that NORAD has yet to explain; "hijackers" that can enable cell phone calls to be made from 35,000 feet in the air when experiments have shown that it wasn't possible for calls to go through on cell phones above 8,000 feet; "hijackers" who couldn't fly Cessnas worth a shit but somehow could fly "airliners" like experts including "Hani Hanjour" making a sharp corkscrew turn in diving in to zoom just a few feet above the ground to hit the Pentagon, yet more than 5 years later we have yet to see a video clip that actually shows an airliner crashing into the Pentagon when there were NUMEROUS cameras pointed at the site; "hijackers" who had such magical powers as to enable one of their passports to "survive" the fire that we were told incinerated the plane it was in, the passengers and the plane's black box, AND "survive" the demolition of the Tower the plane was in, to be "found" a couple days later just in time to falsely shore up the "official" 9/11 myth; "hijackers" who must have telepathically contacted Bush and his Secret Service staff at Booker Elementary and told them not to worry, that Bush wasn't even a possible target, otherwise they would have followed standard operating procedure and immediately picked Bush up by his armpits and CARRIED him away as soon as Andy Card told him "America is under attack", instead of ALLOWING him to remain in that well-publicized location for at least 35 more minutes AFTER Card told him, meaning they "somehow" KNEW Bush was in no danger; "hijackers" who make "airliners" disintegrate into nothing but tiny chunks with no fuselage, tail section, wings etc. visible like at the Pentagon and Shanksville, twice on the same morning; "hijackers" who SOMEHOW convinced the Cheney regime to make themselves look terribly guilty by having the WTC steel debris shipped off to China and India to be melted down as soon as was humanly possible to remove it from Ground Zero, and further made themselves look guilty by steadfastly refusing for over a year to even allow a commission to be formed to investigate 9/11, then only agreeing when Bush/Cheney were allowed to 1.handpick its members, all having vested business interests in keeping the truth under wraps, 2.dictate its scope, meaning it was never about actually INVESTIGATING 9/11 but starting from the (false) premise of "we know WHAT happened and why, we just need to find out how to prevent it in the future", meaning nothing but the "official" myth was ever considered and evidence that contradicts it was discarded, 3.starve it of funds, alloting it $3 million when $45 million was devoted to investigating Clinton's blow job, and 4.on the condition that Bush and Cheney only "testify" together so they can keep their stories congruent (that means matching), only for an hour, behind closed doors, with their attorneys present, and with nothing they say recorded or even written down in notes. Now does that sound like 2 men with nothing to hide?? Even you should find that suspicious Kirk. If you don't you are only proving the lengths you will go to in avoiding facing an uncomfortable truth. And those are just a FEW of the things about the "official" 9/11 fairy tale that render it less believable than that pathological liar character from SNL. So you and people like you have 2 choices Kirk: Either 1.look into 9/11 yourself like many, many people do, and draw what conclusions you will from the mountain of evidence that shows conclusively that the "official" story is an impossible pack of lies, and shows by extension who is responsible; or 2.continue to burrow your head farther and farther up Bush and Cheney's asses and make yourself believe a bullshit story that a child should be able to see through because it is less painful to think "foreign turrrrsts" are responsible for 9/11 than the obvious answer, your own government.
Post a Comment
<< Home