Monday, October 24, 2005

Quick and Dirty Monday AM Update

I've got my new program starting this morning, so this will be fast...

It's beginning to look a lot like Fitzmas! The blogosphere is a-flutter with antici...PATION (go ahead and source that reference) as Patrick Fitzgerald gears up to bring the smackdown to White House staff.

Apparently it's never been discussed as fact before, but Robert TheHack DID actually flip early on:

A critical early success for Fitzgerald was winning the cooperation of Robert D. Novak, the Chicago Sun-Times columnist who named Plame in a July 2003 story and attributed key information to "two senior administration officials." Legal sources said Novak avoided a fight and quietly helped the special counsel's inquiry, although neither the columnist nor his attorney have said so publicly.

All signs point to Fitzgerald opening his can of whoop-ass this week:

After a 22-month inquiry, the special counsel in the C.I.A. leak case, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, is expected to announce this week whether he will seek indictments against White House officials, a decision that is likely to be a defining moment of President Bush's second term.

Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, and I. Lewis Libby Jr., who is Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, have been advised that they are in serious legal jeopardy in a case that began as a minor irritant for the president's aides but has grown into a raging conflagration for the White House.

Of course, you'll always have your band of staunch fucktar... I mean, supporters, who are either bucking for some serious favors or are wearing Jackie-O sized rose-colored glasses. First there's FOX News, who thinks they are actually a news network, but are simply a group of faux-celebrities, pushing the "criminalization of politics" talking point (from Think Progress, vid clips available through link):

In other words, they say, the outing of a covert CIA agent in a time of war to punish a whistleblower is just everyday “politics” — nothing out of the ordinary, certainly nothing criminal. In fact, according to conservatives (as articulated by the National Review), the “criminalizing of politics” is actually “the most dangerous fire of this ordeal.”

To spread this talking point across the nation, the right has received a major assist from Fox News. According to a database search, every single television reference to the CIA leak scandal as the “criminalization of politics” in the last 30 days has been on Fox. Even more stunning: on every occassion, the phrase was introduced into the segment by a Fox News anchor or correspondent, never by a guest.

Again, if there's anyone out there that actually goes to FOX for their news, they should throw themselves down a flight of stairs.

Lastly, there's Kay Bailey Hutchinson, R-TX, who is spinning the latest talking point about the impending leak issues. According to this New York Times article, Republicans are testing several ways to spin this to help ease the public into the knowledge that they'd MAJORLY FUCKED THE COUNTRY BY VOTING FOR THESE BASTARDS LAST YEAR (insert a firm slap to the back of the head if you were one of the sheeple who did it).

Ms. Hutchison said she hoped "that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn't indict on the crime and so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation was not a waste of time and taxpayer dollars."

President Bush said several weeks ago that Mr. Fitzgerald had handled the case in "a very dignified way," making it more difficult for Republicans to portray him negatively.

But allies of the White House have quietly been circulating talking points in recent days among Republicans sympathetic to the administration, seeking to help them make the case that bringing charges like perjury mean the prosecutor does not have a strong case, one Republican with close ties to the White House said Sunday. Other people sympathetic to Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby have said that indicting them would amount to criminalizing politics and that Mr. Fitzgerald did not understand how Washington works.

(BTW, Kay, perjury charges can lead to 5 years in prison, which is a fuckload more than anyone got for the $50 million dress Ken Starr paid for, you little twit.)

Okay, I am off to class - discuss amongst yourselves, and I'll check in later!

20 Comments:

Anonymous Duck said...

I find it quite funny that the republicans cannot stand alone and take the blame for criminal acts. It was soooo easy for them to balme the democrats for everything. Now that they are unable to use it anymore, republicans are struggling to keep the base together. They cannot deflect these scandals, leaks, and corruption.

I'll admit that it appeared that nothing could stick to the republicans for a long time. Now the democrats have found something that is sticking and are not letting go. That's how the republicans swept into power in 94 by building on democrat scandals. I know political science prof's and others are skeptical about democrats returning to power. Well, I am a poker player and I wouldn't want to tip my hand.

Things are happening in the democratic party and people are going to be surprised by waht happens.

October 24, 2005 9:42 AM  
Blogger Brash Limburg said...

Rocky Horror Picture Show...and I finally watched Firefly, kicks ass as advertised

October 24, 2005 10:32 AM  
Blogger sans-culotte said...

Damn I luv it when Mox gets fired up!! After reading a post like this, I'm ready for for some rioting in the streets!

October 24, 2005 11:27 AM  
Blogger MoxieGrrrl said...

Brash gets the gold star for the RHPS reference and a smooch on the cheek for not only watching Firefly, but knowing it was kick ass!

Thanks Sans - I try... Been hard to do lately, as I've been rather distracted, but don't you worry, once things settle a little more, I'll be back to my bitchy self.

October 24, 2005 1:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She wasn't a covert CIA agent at the time and that is why Fitzgerald is going for other nitpicking made-up charges. I seem to remember Clinton commiting Perjury and getting away with it. You can't win at the ballot box so you try other means.

October 24, 2005 2:01 PM  
Blogger MoxieGrrrl said...

Hey Anonymous - She worked for the CIA and her identity was illegally released. Had she NOT been working for the CIA anymore, it would have been a different story.

Stop drinking the fucking Kool Aid. Your lack of ability to think logically is astounding.

October 24, 2005 2:28 PM  
Blogger windspike said...

Meanwhile, the W, Rove and Co is already busy trying to figure out how to lambast Fitzy and deflate the situation with it's usual hit and run political gambit. I read an article today, Washington Post I think, where they suggest the Rove and Co is in full spin awaiting the opportunity to suggest it wasn't their fault. Indeed, if a three year old gets caught with his or her hand in the coookie jar, they always say it wasn't their fault.

These slippery weasels will try and get out of this one too, but let's hope Fitzy nails them to their own cross, a burden the whole country is carrying.

October 24, 2005 2:46 PM  
Blogger Meredith said...

Anonymous...I hate to tell you this, but Clinton didn't "get away with it." He was impeached by the House of Representatives. The Senate, on the other hand, found him not guilty. The vote on the first count was 45-55, and the vote on the second count was 50-50. If my memory serves me correctly, both the House and the Senate were under Republican control. Don't blame the Dems...your guys voted not guilty too.

October 24, 2005 3:40 PM  
Blogger Parklife said...

Its interesting to call a charge "nitpicking" or "made-up". First, calling them "made-up" is just misleading. But, do republicans think its ok to only obey some laws? Or just obey the laws they want to? Where is the line drawn? I really want an answer to this (hopefully a republican can explain it).

Personally, I don't break the law. That is where I draw the line. I expect the same from elected officals.

Break the law, go to jail. How hard is that? A wise person once said, "Don't do the crime if you cant do the time." Words Scooter, Rove, DeLay... ect. ect.. should take to heart.

As far as not winning at the ballot box.. Time will take care of that.

October 24, 2005 3:55 PM  
Anonymous Nicho said...

Personally, I think Anonymous only posts so that they can get attention. There's lots of squirrely asshats on the net that do their best to score what attention they can simply by being spiteful and contradictory.

A worthless existance, to be sure, but I've come to get used to them.

But let me heft some advice in Anon's direction here:
If you want to make a point, by all means do so. But if your point is just to poke sticks in the hornets nest, it goes a long way to explain the way you deal with life. You're the type of person who sues McDonalds for your own obesity.

The the rest of you, keep fighting the ignorant mooncalves - it appears they're running out of spin ammunition if this is the best they can come up with.

October 24, 2005 4:35 PM  
Blogger Iggy Dude said...

Anonymous said...

Hey Anonnymous should'nt bring up Clinton.
You'll get the old defending a bj theory.
Lest forget that he was disbarred from practice in AK. for 5 years and The Supreme Court for life.
The Wilson team (Wilson and his wife) were screw ups, he should not have been in Africa.
Rove things that he may have heard about Wilson via a press leak first.
Wilson was a setup by the Democratic Party.
Digging dirt will produce more dirt.

October 24, 2005 4:51 PM  
Anonymous Digger Smith said...

This administration has NEVER been of the opinion that there is anything wrong with lying...(cf Iraq, for starters) and, you know, perjury is just another word for lying.... so, you know, what's the big deal? Mountains out of molehills, you nasty liberal commie types.....

October 24, 2005 5:44 PM  
Blogger MoxieGrrrl said...

Iggy - would you care to provide any evidence as to how the Wilsons were "screw ups" or how they were set up my the Democratic party?

Try to use at least SEMI-legitimate sources, kthxbye!

October 24, 2005 6:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't wait for Fitzmas and have been looking at the wingnut blogs just to watch 'em squirm and many keep chanting stuff like "Plame was not an undercover agent."???

She lied to all her friends and neighbors, saying that she was an energy consultant who often "consulted" for gov'ts overseas. Her husband was quoted in some Salon article as saying she's a real life version of Alias. I can't find that story atm, but I did find this interesting collection of factoids on Plame. Apparently, she is amazing with an AK-47. Her longtime neighbor says she can't picture it.

clicky

October 24, 2005 6:12 PM  
Anonymous Capn Guts said...

I guess I should use a handle to distinguish myself from the previous anonymous who happened to post exactly what I was riled about. Namely that Plame was anything other than a deep cover agent with a front company set up for her so that she could do her thing with foreign wheelers and dealers of WMD. Most "undercover" agents claim they "work for the gov't." Only the hardcore elite get front companies. She was soooooo undercover that we may never know how many people she may have "recruited" or "handled" who will get targetted soon because someone read Novak's column and cried, "She's F*ing CIA! So, (insert name here) must be her stooge!"

October 24, 2005 6:34 PM  
Anonymous Capn Guts said...

By far the weirdest bit from the article I linked just above...
"She [Plame] attends the same church, but not the same service, as Republican mastermind Karl Rove."

October 24, 2005 6:42 PM  
Blogger Jeremy said...

Anon - didn't mom tell you to get your homework done before playing around on the Internets?

If you don't think the outing of a covert CIA agent isn't necessarily a big deal, perhaps you should read some testimony from a CIA veteran here.

October 24, 2005 10:18 PM  
Blogger Tracey said...

I'll have to search for the link, but there's a quote out there by Hutchinson during Clinton's impeachment trial that says the EXACT OPPOSITE of what she just said in regards to perjury. It's really quite funny to compare the two quotes. I'll have to see if I can find it again...

October 24, 2005 11:31 PM  
Blogger Tracey said...

The link I was talking about in the above post

October 24, 2005 11:44 PM  
Blogger MoxieGrrrl said...

Thanks Tracey - I didn't know about that quote, but proves yet again what a bunch of two-faced morons people will vote into power.

I don't get it. They keep fucking up all over the place and yet I STILL get dumb little sheep clinging to their talking points trying to prove what good guys they all are. It must be nice for them to live in their own little worlds.

October 25, 2005 6:56 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home




Technorati Profile
Who Links Here